Skip to main content

Manager Facebook insults 1 billion Indians. Zuckerberg: 'It is disconcerting'

It has certainly surprised that Marc Andreessen, one of the most important venture capitalists in Silicon Valley and a member of Facebook's board of directors, has received with pleasure the news of the Basics of Free block in India. The nation has appealed to net neutrality, forbidding the introduction of the Facebook internet service in India because local laws prevent to pay to the internet service based on content offered inside.

While it is not surprising the disappointment of Andreessen, who momentarily lost the ability to penetrate a market of 1.3 billion heads, in contrast scandalized his reaction, naively published on Twitter. The original message recited literally: "The anti-colonialism has been economically catastrophic for the Indian people for decades. So why stop now?". After reasonable excuses, the post was later deleted by the same Andreessen.


The audience of the social network did not appreciate the irony and, above all, the post sparked the Facebook media machine, whose communications department has started to send out press right and left in the US: "Of course we do not agree with comments Mr. Andreessen, or those who support them, and we are pleased that it is readily excused, "said a company spokesman. USA Today was however informed that "Facebook strongly rejected by the sentiments expressed by Marc Andreessen on India".

We recall that India was under the control of the British for 200 years. The economic catastrophe that Andreessen refers relates to the 30 years following the obtaining of independence, it won in 1947, when the growth rate was extremely low because of market policies. A vision that can not be transposed to India today, and that in any case should be thorough and not singled out in a boorish manner as done in public artlessly by Andreessen.

The message hit so deeply Facebook (and probably his strategy) that forced its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, to take the field with a public statement released on social networks. Facebook's mission is to connect the world without distinction, and it is precisely for this reason that the company can not afford blunders so despicable by its main exponents: "I found the comments of Mark Andreessen deeply disconcerting," wrote Zuckerberg . "They do not represent at all the way we think, and neither I nor Facebook".

Below the note in full, as published on Facebook.


https://www.facebook.com/zuck/posts/10102645335962321

I want to respond to Marc Andreessen's comments about India yesterday. I found the comments deeply upsetting, and they do not represent the way Facebook or I think at all.
India has been personally important to me and Facebook. Early on in my thinking about our mission, I traveled to India and was inspired by the humanity, spirit and values of the people. It solidified my understanding that when all people have the power to share their experiences, the entire world will make progress.
Facebook stands for helping to connect people and giving them voice to shape their own future. But to shape the future we need to understand the past. As our community in India has grown, I've gained a deeper appreciation for the need to understand India's history and culture. I've been inspired by how much progress India has made in building a strong nation and the largest democracy in the world, and I look forward to strengthening my connection to the country.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Silent Revolution of On-Device AI: Why the Cloud Is No Longer King

Introduction For years, artificial intelligence has meant one thing: the cloud. Whether you’re asking ChatGPT a question, editing a photo with AI tools, or getting recommendations on Netflix — those decisions happen on distant servers, not your device. But that’s changing. Thanks to major advances in silicon, model compression, and memory architecture, AI is quietly migrating from giant data centres to the palm of your hand. Your phone, your laptop, your smartwatch — all are becoming AI engines in their own right. It’s a shift that redefines not just how AI works, but who controls it, how private it is, and what it can do for you. This article explores the rise of on-device AI — how it works, why it matters, and why the cloud’s days as the centre of the AI universe might be numbered. What Is On-Device AI? On-device AI refers to machine learning models that run locally on your smartphone, tablet, laptop, or edge device — without needing constant access to the cloud. In practi...

Apple’s AI Push: Everything We Know About Apple Intelligence So Far

Apple’s WWDC 2025 confirmed what many suspected: Apple is finally making a serious leap into artificial intelligence. Dubbed “Apple Intelligence,” the suite of AI-powered tools, enhancements, and integrations marks the company’s biggest software evolution in a decade. But unlike competitors racing to plug AI into everything, Apple is taking a slower, more deliberate approach — one rooted in privacy, on-device processing, and ecosystem synergy. If you’re wondering what Apple Intelligence actually is, how it works, and what it means for your iPhone, iPad, or Mac, you’re in the right place. This article breaks it all down.   What Is Apple Intelligence? Let’s get the terminology clear first. Apple Intelligence isn’t a product — it’s a platform. It’s not just a chatbot. It’s a system-wide integration of generative AI, machine learning, and personal context awareness, embedded across Apple’s OS platforms. Think of it as a foundational AI layer stitched into iOS 18, iPadOS 18, and m...

Billionaire clothing dynasty heiress launches Everybody & Everyone to make fashion sustainable

Veronica Chou’s family has made its fortune at the forefront of the fast fashion business through investments in companies like Michael Kors and Tommy Hilfiger . But now, the heiress to an estimated $2.1 billion fortune is launching her own company, Everybody & Everyone , to prove that the fashion industry can be both environmentally sustainable and profitable. There’s no argument about the negative impacts of the fashion industry on the environment. The textiles industry primarily uses non-renewable resources — on the order of 98 million tons per year. That includes the oil to make synthetic fibers, fertilizers to grow cotton, and toxic chemicals to dye, treat, and produce the textiles used to make clothes. The greenhouse gas footprint from textiles production was roughly 1.2 billion tons of CO2 equivalent in 2015 — more than all international flights and maritime shipments combined (and a lot of those maritime shipments and international flights were hauling clothes). The lit...